Editorial Policy
Editorial standards, sourcing rules, AI image disclosure, and correction practice at WirelessAC Review.
WirelessAC Review follows a small set of editorial rules that apply to every page. Accuracy first. Statements about IEEE 802.11ac, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7 are checked against published standards and vendor documentation before publication. Where a figure depends on a specific configuration, such as channel width, spatial streams, guard interval, or modulation and coding scheme, the article states the configuration instead of quoting a bare number. Independence. This is a new, independent editorial publication. It is not a former entity under a new name, not a vendor or carrier portal, and not an operating network service. No article is written to favor a named manufacturer, and no page presents sponsored material as editorial content. Sourcing. Articles rely on primary documents where possible: the relevant IEEE amendment, Wi-Fi Alliance materials, datasheets with version and date, and regulatory publications. Secondary reporting and commentary may be used for context and is identified as such. Limits. This publication does not run first hand product tests, lab measurements, or certified benchmarks. It does not publish invented staff, credentials, testimonials, addresses, or phone numbers, and it does not offer a working contact form. Any performance figure discussed comes from documented sources and is attributed. Images. All images on this site are illustrative AI generated artwork. They are used to structure and orient pages and are not photographs of tested equipment, real installations, or real people. Corrections. Errors are corrected openly. A correction request should identify the article, quote the passage, and supply evidence as described on the contact page. When a request is accepted, the article is amended and a short correction note is added stating what changed and when. When a request is declined, the reason is explained. Opinions. Analysis and recommendation pages express editorial judgment and are labeled as such. They are separated from descriptive pages that report what a standard defines.