Contact WirelessAC Review
How to reach WirelessAC Review to request an editorial correction, with the article details and evidence we need.
WirelessAC Review welcomes messages about its editorial content, especially requests for correction. This page explains what to send so a request can be reviewed quickly. When you write about an article, identify it precisely. Include the article title, its full web address on this site, the date shown on the page, and the rubric it appears under, such as 802.11ac Basics, Wi-Fi Generations, or Network Planning. Then quote the exact sentence or passage you believe is wrong and give the location, for example a heading or paragraph number. Explain what you think the correct statement is and why. Evidence matters more than assertion. Useful evidence includes a clause number and section of the relevant IEEE 802.11 amendment, a Wi-Fi Alliance document or generation label definition, a manufacturer datasheet or release note with a version and date, or a regulatory publication. If a source is behind a login or paywall, describe it and quote the relevant lines. Requests without a traceable source may still be read, but they are harder to act on and may be answered with a request for more detail. This publication does not operate a support desk for hardware, drivers, or network outages, and it cannot troubleshoot individual deployments. It also does not provide vendor contact details or repair services. Messages about advertising, sponsorship, or content licensing are out of scope for this page and for the publication as it currently stands. This site does not publish a phone number, a postal address, or a web contact form, and it does not employ named staff whose credentials can be verified on request. Send editorial correspondence by email to the address published in the site footer, and include the word correction in the subject line so it is routed correctly. Every substantive request is read, and accepted corrections are noted in the article itself.